SML Search

Showing posts with label culture. Show all posts
Showing posts with label culture. Show all posts

Sunday, March 23, 2008

Color Wars 2008

No comments:

As reported by Mashable, the color war on Twitter is the latest collaborative fun to show your support for your favorite color.



Apparently how this thing works is you go through the list of color teams that exist, decide which one you want to back, and then follow that color. You get to choose between red, green, yellow, blue, orange, pink, gold, off-white, plaid, fuscia, clear, white, purple, stripe and puce (and Ze Frank is seemingly heavily supporting the green team)


See a list of all the teams at ColorWar2008.com

Color Wars 2008 / 2008-03-22 / SML Screenshots (by See-ming Lee 李思明 SML)

SML Universe, in association with SML AIDS and SML Life, is fully supporting the rainbowteam, because life celebrates diversity.

©2008 See-ming Lee 李思明 SML / SML Pro Blog / SML Universe. All rights reserved.

Wednesday, December 26, 2007

Queen Elizabeth II Christmas Broadcast, 2007

No comments:

Queen Elizabeth II joins her country folks and posted her annual Christmas Broadcast this year on YouTube:

YouTube: The Christmas Broadcast, 2007 Embedding disabled by TheRoyalChannel so you have to see it on YouTube - Read transcript

The video was uploaded at 3pm GMT on 2007-07-25 and so far has been favorited 288 times, over 900 ratings with 123,651 in 3 short hours. At the time to this writing, it has received 7 honors:

+ #7 - Most Viewed (This Week) - United Kingdom
+ #2 - Most Viewed (This Week) - People & Blogs - United Kingdom
+ #11 - Most Viewed (This Week) - People & Blogs
+ #7 - Top Rated (This Week) - United Kingdom
+ #96 - Top Rated (This Week)
+ #4 - Top Rated (This Week) - People & Blogs - United Kingdom
+ #12 - Top Rated (This Week) - People & Blogs

TheRoyalChannel joined YouTube 2 months ago, has 19 videos posted, and now has 14,680 subscribers and 732,121 channel views. Fairly impressive.

Web 2.0 save the queen.

Related SML Universe
+ Life 2.0
+ SML Channel
+ SML Data
+ SML YouTube

SML Copyright Notice
©2007 See-ming Lee 李思明 SML / SML Pro Blog / SML Universe. All rights reserved.

Wednesday, November 21, 2007

UGC = Love + Culture + Free Speech / Larry Lessig / TED Talks

2 comments:

Stanford professor Larry Lessig gets TEDsters to their feet, whooping and whistling, following this elegant presentation of "three stories and an argument." The Net's most adored lawyer brings together John Philip Sousa, celestial copyrights, and the "ASCAP cartel" to build a case for creative freedom. He pins down the key shortcomings of our dusty, pre-digital intellectual property laws, and reveals how bad laws beget bad code. Then, in an homage to cutting-edge artistry, he throws in some of the most hilarious remixes you've ever seen.

TED Talks: Larry Lessig: How creativity is being strangled by the law




SML Copyright Notice
©2007 See-ming Lee 李思明 SML / SML Pro Blog / SML Universe. All rights reserved.

Wednesday, November 14, 2007

The HBR Interview with Jeff Bezos

No comments:

Harvard Business Review did an interview with Jeff Bezos, founder and CEO of Amazon, on the October 2007 issue.

Here are my key take aways:

Amazon.com = Strategy

Amazon.com was born of strategy.

Base your strategy on things that won't change:
Jeff Bezos: When I am talking with people outside the company, there's a question that comes up very commonly: "What's going to change in the next five to ten years?" At Amazon we're always trying to figure that out, because you can really spin up flywheels around those things. All the energy you invest in them today will still be paying you dividends ten years from now. Whereas if you base your strategy first and foremost on more transitory things — who your competitors are, what kind of technologies are available, and so on — those things are going to change so rapidly that you're going to have to change your strategy very rapidly, too.

If in the old world you devoted 30% of your attention to building a great service and 70% of your attention to shouting about, in the new world that inverts.

No-brainers = important
Jeff Bezos: We're still working on identifying [the constants] for the developer community, although we have some good guesses as to what they are. Reliability of the platform would be one, which is a kind of a no-brainer. But then a lot of these things are no-brainers. No-brainers are no-brainers for a reason: They actually are important.

Social features = Customers first
Jeff Bezos: One of the ways to get vast selection is to invite other sellers, third parties, onto our websites to participate alongside us, and make it into a win-win situation...

Now, if we're offering a certain digital camera and you're a seller with the same camera to sell, you can go right on our own detail page and underbid us.

It was a very controversial decision internally at the time.

Whenever we're facing one of those too-hard problems, where we get into an infinite loop and can't decide what to do, we try to convert it into a straightforward problem by saying, "Well, what's better for the consumer?"

We don't make money when we sell things; we make money when we help customers make purchase decisions

How to be #1 = customer focus
Jeff Bezos: If you're competitor focused, you tend to slack off when your benchmarks say that you're the best. But if your focus on customers, you keep improving. So there are a lot of advantages.

Listen to your customers first-hand
Jeff Bezos: Every new employee, no matter how senior or junior, has to go spend time in our fulfillment centers within the first year of employment.
HBR: Even you?
Jeff Bezos: Oh, yeah. I just got re-certified about six months ago. The fact that I did a lot of customer service in the first two years has not exempted me. Besides, it's quite entertaining, and you learn a ton. It's not a chore.

Response to Barnes & Nobles = customer focus
Jeff Bezos: I told everyone [in an all-hands meeting], "Yes, you should wake up every morning terrified with your sheets drenched in sweat, but not because you're afraid of our competitors. Be afraid of our customers, because those are the folks who have the money. Our competitors are never going to send us money."

Don't just ask why, but why not as well
Jeff Bezos: When something seems like an opportunity — it seems like you have the skills, and maybe some kind of advantage, and you think it's a big area — you will always get asked the question, "Why? Why do that?" But Why not?... But that question doesn't get asked. It's an asymmetry that is linked to those errors of omission.

Innovation: The institutional yes
Jeff Bezos: Sometimes you make guesses and you think, When we launch this, people are going to love it. And they don't... Our history is full of things like that, where we came up with an innovation that we thought was really cool, and the customers didn't care. Fortunately, there are also quite a few that went the other way... And by the way, it's very fun to have the kind of culture where people are willing to take these leaps &mash; it's the opposite of the "institutional no." It's the institutional yes. People say, "We're going to do this. We're going to figure out a way."

Pursue your believes
Jeff Bezos: My observation on [the early results of experiments] would be that it's important to be stubborn on the vision and flexible on the details. I talked about the evolution of our marketplace business — that's a good example of where we wee relentless on the vision... We worked on it for a few years. But we didn't give up on the vision... If you really believe that the addressable market is big enough for it to matter, then it pays to be stubborn in pursuing that.

Company culture at Amazon
Jeff Bezos: I'm actually thinking, who doesn't [say no to me]?... Intensity is important. I always tell people that our culture is friendly and intense, but if push comes to shove, we'll settle for intense. But there is no contradiction between being intense and having fun... In a one-hour meeting we may spend ten minutes of it joking around, and I'm often the worst offender. I'll laugh and say, "This reminds me of..." and get us off on some story. Eventually somebody says, "Well, that is very interesting, but you do see we have an agenda..." And I think that works out great."

Full article available as a PDF for purchase at HBR:
Harvard Business Review: 2007-10: The Institutional Yes: The HBR Interview with Jeff Bezos: How Amazon's CEO leads strategic change in a culture obsessed with today's customer by Julia Kirby and Thomas A. Stewart

Also available in the print edition of Harvard Business Review: 2007-10: pp.74-82



SML Copyright Notice
©2007 See-ming Lee 李思明 SML / SML Pro Blog / SML Universe. All rights reserved.

Wednesday, October 31, 2007

Digital Agencies: to blog or not to blog

No comments:
Logic+Emotion has posted a survey on whether digital agencies should blog and it is making rounds on the Internet. The post itself fairly simple, but the discussion (i.e. comment area) is very interesting:

Logic + Emotion: Should digital agencies be blogging?

Related


SML Thank You
I would like to thank Tarky7 / Kit Latham (Google / SML Wiki) for sending this article to me.

SML Copyright Notice

©2007 See-ming Lee 李思明 SML / SML Pro Blog / SML Universe. All rights reserved.

Wednesday, October 10, 2007

Teamwork / U.S. Marines

1 comment:

Recently I had lunch with a retired U.S.Marines veteran with more than 28 years of experience (LinkedIn: Joseph Brennan). The topic of teamwork came up, and he talked about what it means to be a team on the military:

SML Flickr: Teamwork / 2007 / SML Notebook



  • Same ability. The military trains its soldiers to possess the same skills as everyone else, such that when one falls down in the field, another soldier can carry on the same tasks.
  • Same knowledge. To maximize the efficiency of communication, every soldier in the field have access to the latest information regarding the battlefield.
  • Interpret instructions the same way. Authorizations (the briefs) are always written in a clean and clear manner such that the action carried out will be the same regardless of the person asked to carry out the instructions. In a war scenario, when the person given those instructions dies, the next person given those instructions ought to be carrying out the same actions
  • Efficiency of the team depends largely on the team members having the same knowledge, speed and strength. To do so, they need access to the same information
  • The team can be as soon as its weakest member.
  • To evaluate performance of teamwork, take out half of the team and evaluate the length of time that team can still survive given the same condition
  • The military does not create specialists.


If we are to apply these methodologies into the business world, it will look something like this:
  • Everyone working at the same company ought to have the same level of knowledge related to works done by the company
  • In this ideology, designers should know how to write programs, and programmers ought to know design principals
  • Efficiency of the work force will be greatly enhanced if every bit of information is shared among the team
  • New acquired knowledge will be shared among all members of the force through either corporate emails or blogs.
  • When you can get everyone to have a working style that has almost the assemblance of a single person (hive mind), projects will be much easier to handle


Related SML Universe
SML Notebook: Teamwork / 2007 / SML Notebook
SML Flickr: Teamwork / 2007 / SML Notebook

This post needs some tweaking

SML Copyright Notice
©2007 See-ming Lee 李思明 SML / SML Pro Blog / SML Universe. All rights reserved.

Wednesday, October 3, 2007

Corporate Social Networks / Business Week

No comments:
Corporate Social Networks / 2007-10-01 / Business Week
The Water Cooler Is Now on the Web: With a nod to Facebook, large companies are starting in-house social networks / 2007-01-01 / Business Week / pp.78-79


Statistics

  • Share of employees at large companies who say they contribute regularly to blogs, social networks, wikis and other Web 2.0 Services = 20%
  • Number of professionals on LinkedIn = 13 million
  • Starcom MediaVest Group’s internal network = SMG Connected
  • Number of SMG Connected Users = 2,060 = 1/3 of the comapny's workers
  • Number of Ernst & Young (Google) workers with Facebook accounts = 11,000
  • Number of users on KPMG Alumni network = 10,000 former and current employees
  • KPMG (Google) credits 14% of total hires to their alumni network
  • Estimated time saved by the Film Foundation (Google) to create educational materials for schools = 50%

Benefits of social networks
  • Efficient way to mine for in-house expertise
  • Discover new recruits
  • Share information within businesses' own walls
  • Reduce time spent mailing documents and e-mailing comments

The Fear of being open
  • CIOs from large companies, especially financial institutions such as Citigroup (NYSE:C) and Lehman Brothers (NYSE:LEH), block employee access to public social networks for fear of losing control of information in response to the “open” ethos of the social Net
  • Accounting firms ensure members don't provide tax or accounting advice through their networks in order to comply to regulatory / disclosure issues
  • Awareness tracks network posts and sends potentially inflammatory words into “moderation boxes” to be reviewed by a manager.

Corporate Social Network Platforms

Read the full article on BusinessWeek.com: The Water Cooler Is Now on the Web: With a nod to Facebook, large companies are starting in-house social networks / 2007-01-01 / BusinessWeek.com


SML Copyright Notice


©2007 See-ming Lee 李思明 SML / SML Pro Blog / SML Universe. All rights reserved.

Sunday, September 16, 2007

How to unGoogle yourself

6 comments:
In order to protect those who might feel comfortable sharing information with fellow Yalies but not the entire Interwebz, I’ll be ensuring that none of the names included are Google-able.—Annitah Patrick (LinkedIn) / Yale Alumni Magazine > July / August 2007 Class Notes / xoxoANP!

Recently there has been a lot of talks of unGoogling. The drive to unGoogle oneself is so persistent that:

  1. My classmates from Yale have forced the class secretary for the alumni magazine, to write class notes in hacker alias ID’ing. In ANP hacker notation, my name will be rendered as S33-M1NG L33.
  2. I was threatened advised by many of my friends to mark their photographs private and remove their names from my Flickr stream.
  3. I was forwarded a Wikihow article on how to unGoogle yourself.

After a bit of digging, it appears that this craziness trace back to some article on the Wall Street Journal: You’re a nobody unless your name Googles well / Page One / 2007-05-27 / WSJ. It mysterfies me why unGoogling has become the number one extreme sports on the web, so I did a little bit of investigation.

Reasons for unGoogling

Some people confide to me that the reason they don’t want to be searchable is because they have been stalked before and wish to be untraceable. A few of the folks I talked to attribute it to the potential for identity theft, but after a few more rounds of questioning in typical SML fashion, it all boils down to their biggest fear that their social activites might harm their job search.

Silly rabbits. I don’t know what kind of employment you are seeking, but if it is a company that you plan to be spending some time with, for your the benefits of your own mental health, it had better be one who allows you to be who you are. If a company cannot accept that life celebrates diversity, then perhaps that company is not a good fit for you. As Steve Jobs once addressed an entire class of Standard graduates, your time is limited, don’t waste it living someone else’s life (You’ve got to find what you love / Steve Jobs). In other words, be who you are, and find that company who values you for who you are. I work for the company that I am at now precisely because it recognizes my multiple skills and encourages me to put my entire head into my work.

Some day, when I am ready to start my own company, I will want my employees to be diverse, varied and energetic. I will want them to be individuals with multiple skillsets who have the agility and versatility to take on any types of clients and industries. I will want them to get all adrenaline from their extreme activities to be able to work on their projects better.

If any task requires mono-dimensional 24-7 professional workaholics (SML Dictionary: boring, uncreative and uninspiring individuals), I think that I would prefer bots and spiders instead. Trust me, they are far more efficient and economical than you are.

If you don’t buy my job search advice and are still determined to create a one-dimension personality on the Web, such that you can fulfill your masochistic desire to be in a long-term relationship where your partner appreciates your helpfulness in doing the dishes but criticizes everything else which make you unique, I offer these advice:

How to unGoogle: Noise over signal

  1. The best way to for you to remove your unwanted data from appearing into the public mainstream is to create more data for Google to index.
  2. The best way to be most invisible to prowling eyes is to have the most visibility in the most public places.
  3. You see this in movies all the time: if you need to do any form of "exchanges," you do it out in the open.

Why? It’s all mathematics:

  1. The probability of someone finding something about you over 5 valid hits is very easy.
  2. The probability of someone finging something about you over 50,000 valid hits is fairly hard.
  3. Retrieving signals over noise (data which you cannot readily interpret) is much harder than retrieving signals over signals (data which you can comprehend readily).

How to unGoogle: SEO

  1. Fact: Google’s Page Rank algorithm has largely to do with network theory. It ranks pages based on how times a page is linked to it by other pages, factoring their relevance (AboutUs: Google.com)
  2. Fact: 91.63% of the users click on links on the first page of the result page (Leaked AOL data: the importance of top search engine rankings)
  3. In other words, if you can generate enough relevant noise onto your first SERP (Wikipedia: Search Engine Results Page), you are fairly safe from being stalked.

How do you do that? Here’s one way to do it:

  1. Create a fake persona for yourself with the same name with a quirky personality. For example: a 57yo-widow who enjoys knitting, playing with kittens, network-savvy, and reads Daily Candy every day to catchup on the latest fashion advice so she can make more friends at her local community center.
  2. Register this identity with all the social networking sites you can scoop up. Need a place to start? Go to Mashable’s oh-so-useful social network grid.
  3. Once you have registered, create profiles resembling your alter-ego and create relevant content and social-network with people that are relevant to your assumed identity.
  4. Get all your profiles on these networks to link to each other so that you create a web of the Web.
  5. Remember to social-network with people similar to your alter-ego so that you remain to be very relevant
  6. Post photographs of cats on your Flickr stream, and link back to your cat blog; post videos of your cats on YouTube and blog about it; furiously digg and bookmark all the cute cats that you like on del.icio.us
  7. In other words, use the knowledge you gained from your SEO (Wikipedia: Search Engine Optimization) research and optimise your alter-ego to be really popular. These should get your real identity way down the SERP. You should be fairly safe now.

You don’t have faith in me? Try it, Google me and tell me who I am. Am I a professional in the field of design, technology and marketing strategy, or am I simply a very well-written artificial intelligence algorithm crafted by my creator, whose true identity is cleverly concealed as you attempt to look for the needle in the haystack?

How not to unGoogle: History removal

Removing history does not work. Public unsearchability creates a false sense of safety. Just because you are not searchable by the public domain does not equate unsearchability.

Put yourself in the shoe of Google: if you just spend a whole lot of resources to dig up all these information, are you really going to disposed them all that easily? Most likely not. If I were Google, I will be happy to remove your result from the public domain to keep peace with you.

Tada! Due to quesiontable actions committed by you to fulfill your very desire to remove data, I have just identified why I get into the search business at the first place: to mine important intelligence data that no one else has a copy of. Thanks to your help, I have just identified what you considered to be most damaging to your credibility. I’m sure that businesses will pay me tons of money just to get their hands onto my treasure chest.

Machine data vs Real intelligence

Google is not the only source of data available. The best data do not come from 1s and 0s mirrored across the universe. The best data (aka secrets) comes from human memory.

I used to work for Rumpus as an information designer when I was in college. For those who are unfamiliar with Rumpus, Rumpus is the oldest college tabloid in the United States. From what I remember, it takes approximately one day for us to make a few phone calls to get the list of tapped members of the tombs, including the list of very-soon-to-be infamous members of societies who were not fortunate to be recruited by those with a tomb. We publish them every year. (In case you are considering sending hate mails to me, I would like to remind you that I am not responsible for those undigging. I was the information designer. I was responsible for creating maps of showing all the numbers of the Blue Phones clearly and legibly over the campus for your daily prank indulgence.)

I also spent a long time in college being the photo editor for The Yale Herald, the weekly college paper with articles that people read and comic strips that are actually good. What I have learned from that experience, aside from the potential danger of caffeine overdose, is that when you are carrying an SLR and a Moleskine, people are more than willing to give you information. Try that yourself at your next Harry Potter launch party.

Conclusion

Once indexed, your data will be there forever. You cannot remove things. You can only add to it. If you wish to remove anything, just make it very difficult to search for. Your best policy, as such, is really very simple:

  1. As long as you don’t do anything that you think is damaging to yourself, there will never be anything there to damage you.
  2. Try to maintain the habit of being responsible for every action you make, every word you say, and every movement your body create.
  3. When you have nothing to hide, you will be fearless.
  4. When you are fearless, you will be happy.